|
|
|
|
|
|
Dave
Crocker's
Personal Web Page |
|
David H. Crocker is a principal with Brandenburg
InternetWorking. He has contributed to the development of internetworking
capabilities for more than forty-five years, first as part of the Arpanet research
community and then in the commercial sector.
Mr. Crocker's curriculum
vitae is also available.
|
Writings,
musings, & foils |
|
|
Professional
Efforts |
|
|
|
Personal
Efforts |
- A
Malaysian Journal, On our living
and working in Malaysia
- Winter
Weekend in Geneva
- First Time in Seoul
- Two
Weeks in South America, July 2001
- England
Family, Aug 2001
- Some L.A.
Family, Nov 2001
- Steve's
IEEE Award Ceremony at INET, Jun 2002
- Japan,
Jul 2002
- Paul
Celebrates 83, Sep 2002
- LA Thanksgiving 2002 - Willens / Crocker
- Año
Nuevo 2002 - 29 Dec 02 - 1 Jan 03
- Howard
Sobel - 1916-2003
- Bumi
- Japan -
Jan 2004
- Bali -
Jun-July 2004
- Melissa
Crocker's MD/MBA Graduation - May 2005
- Florida -
Jun 2006
- Casavant
Frères - Jul 2006
- A Slice of
voices in the past - Jun 16, 1962
- Steve Crocker » mp3
- George Willens » mp3
- David Crocker » mp3
- First
Hot-Air Balloon Ride
- MAAWG
Pro-Fishing Expedition - Sept. 25,2008, Ft. Lauderdale
- Norman Crocker's
90th Birthday
- Moments
with the Ding-A-Ling Sisters
and Family » stream, download
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use "they" instead
of he/she
Third-person gender neutrality writing is not improved with
he/she quite the opposite.
Consider:
-
He/she is linguistically awkward and self-conscious.
-
He/she places 'he' first, thereby continuing a gender
bias; alternating the combination merely makes the construct
that much more awkward.
Alternating use of he and she again sustains a gender
bias for each use and again sustains linguistic awkwardness.
Note:
|
|
|
Costs
of Progress |
From "Inherit
the Wind"
Gentlemen, progress has never been a bargain. You've got
to pay for it. Sometimes I think there's a man behind a
counter who says 'All right, you can have a telephone;
but you'll have to give up privacy and the charm of distance.
Madam, you may vote; but at at price; you lose the right
to retreat behind a powder puff or a petticoat. Mister,
you may conquer the air; but the birds will lose their
wonder and the clouds will smell of gasoline.' Darwin moved
us forward to a hilltop, where we can look back and see
the way from the which we came. But for this view, this
insight, this knowledge, we must abandon our faith in the
pleasant poetry of Genesis.
|
|
|
Eight
Fallacies of
Distributed Computing |
Essentially everyone, when they first build
a distributed application, makes the following eight assumptions.
All prove to be false in the long run and all cause big trouble
and painful learning experiences.
-
The network is reliable
-
Latency is zero
-
Bandwidth is infinite
-
The network is secure
-
Topology doesn't change
-
There is one administrator
-
Transport cost is zero
-
The network is homogeneous
|
Peter
Deutsch |
|
|
|
The
Beginning of the Web |
A quarter of a century before it was invented in 1989:
As
We May Think
Vannevar Bush
The Atlantic, July 1945
And a video of its instantiation, 23 years later
Doug Engelbart
Fall Joint Computer Conference, San Francisco, 1968
"The mother of all demos" -- On December 9, 1968, Douglas C. Engelbart and the group of 17 researchers working with him in the Augmentation Research Center at Stanford Research Institute in Menlo Park, CA, presented a 90-minute live public demonstration of the online system, NLS, they had been working on since 1962. |
|
|
No
One Could Have Predicted How the Internet Would Be Used |
Except the folks who started it...
Man-Computer Symbiosis
J. C. R. Licklider
IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics,
volume HFE-1, pages 4-11, March 1960
It seems reasonable to envision, for a time 10 or 15 years hence, a "thinking center" that will incorporate the functions of present-day libraries together with anticipated advances in information storage and retrieval and the symbiotic functions suggested earlier in this paper. The picture readily enlarges itself into a network of such centers, connected to one another by wide-band communication lines and to individual users by leased-wire services.
The
Computer as a Communication Device
J.C.R. Licklider and Robert W. Taylor
Science and Technology, April 1968.
Face to face through a computer
At a project meeting held through a computer, you can thumb
through the speaker’s primary data without interrupting
him to substantiate or explain.
On-line interactive communities
Available within the network will be functions and services
to which you subscribe on a regular basis and others that
you call for when you need them. In the former group will
be investment guidance, tax counseling, selective dissemination
of information in your field of specialization, announcement
of cultural, sport, and entertainment events that fit your
interests, etc. In the latter group will be dictionaries,
encyclopedias, indexes, catalogues, editing programs, teaching
programs, testing programs, programming systems, data bases,
and—most important—communication, display, and
modeling programs.
...
What will on-line interactive communities be like? In most
fields they will consist of geographically separated members,
sometimes grouped in small clusters and sometimes working
individually. They will be communities not of common location,
but of common interest. In each field, the overall community
of interest will be large enough to support a comprehensive
system of field-oriented programs and data.
...
You will not send a letter or a telegram; you will simply
identify the people whose files should be linked to yours
and the parts to which they should be linked-and perhaps specify
a coefficient of urgency. You will seldom make a telephone
call; you will ask the network to link your consoles together. |
|
|
Agreement |
If we are all in agreement on the decision -
then I propose we postpone further discussion of this matter
until our next meeting to give ourselves time to develop disagreement
and perhaps gain some understanding of what the decision is
all about.
Alfred
P. Sloan
|
|
|
Email
History |
This email service you use today has an historical arc, dating back to roughly 1965, with its ability to travel between machines starting at the end of 1971. Most astonishing is that an Arpanet email message sent in the mid-1970s has almost exactly the same technical core format and components as an email sent today!
For a timeline and a range of historical accountings, see: emailhistory.org. |
Email Invention 'Controversy' |
In 2012, the long-standing email technical community was surprised to discover that there was claimed to be some controversy about its origin. This prompted quite a bit of community activity, discussing both the actual history and the supposed controversy. Excellent research and reporting work followed.
|
|